Loose Change Fried 6

See Loose Change Fried 1, Loose Change Fried 2, Loose Change Fried 3, Loose Change Fried 4, and Loose Change Fried 5.

     It’s time to continue exposing the lies from Loose Change, continuing from my previous article.

     At 36 minutes and 5 seconds, Loose Change repeats the freefall lie.  However, as you see from the picture here, the debris OUTSIDE the building falls FASTER than the floors.

     Loose Change also claims that 200,000 tons of steel shattered into sections no more than a couple feet long while ignoring the fact that it’s difficult to get an accurate sense of scale when referring to the WTC ( source).

     Avery also claims that tons of concrete were pulverized into dust, but as this site  points out, that is an assumption ( again, the first 3 letters of assume accurately describe what the “truthers” keep making of themselves), as there was plenty of concrete that was NOT dust.  This link also reminds us that there was plenty of gypsum, insulation, etc that would be much easier to pulverize into dust than concrete.       

     At 36 minutes and 22 seconds, Loose Change asks what brought down the WTC.  Hint:  it’s called gravity ( reference).   As for the source of gravity, that would be a little thing we call the Earth.

     These quotes from here from Loose Change in the same time frame come from Van Romero, the Vice President for Research at New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology: “My opinion is, based on the videotapes, after the airplanes hit the World Trade Center, there were some explosive devices inside that caused the towers to collapse. The collapses were too methodical to be a chance result of airplanes colliding with the structures, ” and from ten days later, “Certainly the fire is what caused the building to fail.”

     Next, at 36 minutes and 48 seconds,  Loose Change wants to know why Romero suddenly changed his mind.  As we see here, the answer is simple:  Unlike the CT’s, Van Romero is honest and talked to the REAL experts. In other words, he talked to the structural engineers and people involved in the investigation and admitted he was wrong.

     At 36 minutes, and 52 seconds, Loose Change states that the WTC was designed to withstand a Boeing 707 hitting it.  While this is technically true, this quote from here  tells us what Loose Change left out: “Yes, a 707 lost in the fog, traveling at approach speed after dumping fuel. Anyway, the buildings did withstand the impact, despite heavy damage. What impresses most engineers is how long the buildings stood up.”

     Loose Change claims that Underwriters Laboratories certified the steel used in the WTC which is a blatant lie ( source).

     At 38 minutes and 20 seconds, Loose Change claims that not even the experts agree with each other.  Again, that’s false- In point of fact, not one single structural engineer ( you know, the guys who are actually QUALIFIED in this area) has agreed with the CT’s ( source).

     From 40 minutes and 58 seconds to 42 minutes and 54 seconds, Avery harps on the loud noises (  explosions) and flashes of light as the WTC collapse. However, as this site reminds us, 1) Most explosions are not caused by bombs, 2) 200 million pounds falling onto 800 million pounds is going to be a bit noisy, and 3) Electrical cables and transformers blowing are going to cause flashes of light.

     Oh, this site also raises another excellent point:  If the elevator shafts were hermetically sealed and airtight, then how the heck did people get in and out of the elevators?          

     Now, if you’ll excuse me, I’m off to fertilize my garden with Loose Change-  the only time it’ll ever be put to good use.

 

 

 

 

Advertisements

Posted September 30, 2008 by Victor Chabala in Real 9/11 Facts

Tagged with , ,

%d bloggers like this: