Yet More "Truther" Deception

It’s time to expose the “truthers” for the liars they are, once again.

If you go here, the first post provides two Youtube videos.

Watch the first Youtube video and you will notice that the video cuts out on certain words, at about 10-12 seconds into the video, and again about 20 seconds in, making it rather obvious that someone just took clips of news interviews and selectively edited it. Furthermore, look at the bottom of the screen, and you’ll see the following statements at the bottom of the screen: At 10 seconds, the bottom of the screen reads, “ Five years since 9/11, conspiracy theories persist.

 

At about 16 seconds, the statement changes to, “ Theory: Al Qaeda is not responsible for 9/11 attacks.”

Also, at 12 seconds, the guy on the left hand side, says he thinks he has a pretty good understanding of what happened on 9/11. Then there’s a rather obvious edit, making it clear that someone purposely cut some stuff out.

At 37 seconds into the video, they have a Fox News woman saying they mistakenly ran the wrong video to accompany the story, and they apologize for the error. However, if you look closely, you’ll see that, 1) it’s extremely blurry, which is yet another indication of poor editing, or possibly something like the copy of a copy effect, 2) the one picture you can see reasonably well doesn’t seem to have anything to do with 9/11. And 3) News networks inadvertently run the wrong video to go with the story all the time. There’s nothing suspicious about that at all; it’s called human error.

Next, we have the following Youtube video, found here.

 

At about 13- 18 seconds, you see something heading towards the World Trade Center from the upper right-hand corner of the screen, and the video questions it being a Boeing 767. However, as you can see, the object in question is too far away to allow one to make out any details.

At 26, they make a big deal about the camera switch, but, since it’s fairly obvious that it was more than likely the second plane hitting, the camera switch isn’t really a surprise.

At 2 minutes, 7 seconds, it makes a big deal of a black spot between the towers. Number one, if you look where the arrow is pointing, you really can’t see the black spot very well. Number two, about 2 seconds later, you see an explosion just below where the arrow is pointing, at about the spot the second plane hit, so, logic dictates that that black spot we briefly see between the towers, if it was there at all, was more than likely the second plane. Before someone points out that the plane would not have been black, depending on one’s position relative to the towers, the plane, and the sun, (as well as one’s distance from the towers) the plane might have appeared black.

Between 5 and 6 minutes, the video switches to the Pentagon, and takes a quote by Mike Walters out of context at 5 minutes and 46 seconds to 5 minutes and 52 seconds. Mike Walters CLEARLY says he saw a plane, an AMERICAN AIRLINES JET, and said he was thinking, this doesn’t add up, the plane’s flying really low. “Truthers” only bother with the first part of that sentence. However, when one looks at the ENTIRE STATEMENT, it’s pretty obvious he’s referring to the low altitude of said plane.

Mike Walters did NOT say it was a cruise it was LIKE a cruise missile with wings. Hint to the 9/11 “Truth” Movement; that’s called a simile. Merriam-Webster’s Online Dictionary provides the following definition of a simile: “a figure of speech comparing two unlike things that is often introduced by like or as.”

At 6 minutes, and 4 seconds, Mike Walters states that he could CLEARLY see the AA on the side of the plane.

At 6 minutes, and 14 seconds, they use the usual lie that that there could not have been a plane since the security cameras at the Pentagon did not pick up a plane.

Of course, there are two problems with that claim: One, the frame rate of a security camera is only 1 or 2 frames per second, which is NOT enough to capture a speeding airliner, and 2) Last time I checked, security cameras tend to point DOWN, not up.

If the 9/11 “Truth” Movement really believes these Youtube videos are accurate, then I have a bridge I’d like to sell them- it has a very nice view of Brooklyn.

 

Advertisements

Posted June 2, 2009 by Victor Chabala in Real 9/11 Facts

Tagged with