Even More "Truther" Desperation

     “Truther” A, who has been mentioned previously is still managing to make a complete fool of himself.

     First, he wants to know about Hanjour’s flying skills, which we have explained to him MANY times, by this quote from 911myths.com: “In 1996, Hanjour returned to the United States to pursue flight training, after being rejected by a Saudi flight school. He checked out flight schools in Florida, California, and Arizona; and he briefly started at a couple of them before returning to Saudi Arabia. In 1997, he returned to Florida and then, along with two friends, went back to Arizona and began his flight training there in earnest. After about three months, Hanjour was able to obtain his private pilot’s license. Several more months of training yielded him a commercial pilot certificate, issued by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) in April 1999… Settling in Mesa, Hanjour began refresher training at his old school, Arizona Aviation. He wanted to train on multi-engine planes, but had difficulties because his English was not good enough. The instructor advised him to discontinue but Hanjour said he could not go home without completing the training. In early 2001, he started training on a Boeing 737 simulator at Pan Am International Flight Academy in Mesa. An instructor there found his work well below standard and discouraged him from continuing. Again, Hanjour persevered; he completed the initial training by the end of March 2001.”

     Next, he uses an article by AE911Truth, which, in typical “truther” fashion, compares apples to oranges by comparing the WTC to the Madrid Windsor tower.  However, as we see here, AE911Truth leaves out the following key differences: 1: No plane hit the Madrid Windsor Tower, 2: The Madrid Windsor Tower did NOT sustain severe structural damage before catching fire ( and before “truthers” say neither did WTC 7, that’s a lie. Refer to 911myths.com and you will see that NYFD Captain Chris Boyle, who, unlike the “truthers,” was actually there, stated that there was a hole about 20 stories high on the SOUTH side of the building.  Pictures “truthers” use are of the NORTH side), and 3) Unlike the WTC, the core of the Madrid Windsor tower was mostly concrete.  911myths.com  points out that the bit of steel the Madrid Windsor Tower DID have COMPLETELY collapsed on the upper technical floor.

            Then he provides this article stating that a career Army officer by the name of April Gallup is suing the Bush administration and claiming that there was no plane at the Pentagon.  There’s just one thing they don’t mention.  As we see from this quote from here: “Judge Chin has just dismissed the Gallop case. He said that the allegations are frivolous and based on fantasy and delusion.”  There’s a good reason for this-  if you will refer to an interview with April Gallup from July 13, 2006, you will see that she did originally said there was indeed a plane ( reference ). Simply put, she is clearly contradicting herself, which means that she is, by definition, LYING.

            Of course, during the aforementioned interview, when talking about restricted airspace, she neglects to mention that the Pentagon is NOT restricted air space due to the fact that it is EXTREMELY close to the approach for Ronald Reagan International Airport, which means that planes fly over the Pentagon all the time ( reference ).

            “Truther” A then provides this YouTube video  claiming there were underground explosions.  However, if you watch carefully from 8 seconds to 16 seconds, it is quite obvious to anyone with half a brain ( which is more than “truthers” have), that 1:  It is moving far too slowly to be an explosion, and 2:  it is merely dust and debris being kicked up in a violent collapse.  When called on this, “Truther’ A’s response was to sarcastically imply that dust from falling debris can’t go up.  Of course, when I provided the following YouTube videos here  and here of dust from collapsing buildings flying up, he completely ignored it as, like most “truthers,” he can’t be bothered with facts.

            Finally, “Truther” A uses this conspiracy site, which talks about The Project For The New American Century (PNAC), as “proof” of a conspiracy. There’s just one problem- the site claims the PNAC was written in September of 2000, which would make CLINTON the president at that time.  Also, the statement that it was written in September of 2000 is ITSELF a lie. One need only go to the PNAC  Web site  and one can see that it was, in point of fact, published on June 3, 1997, which means it had to have been written PRIOR to that date.  Logically, they had to write it before they published it. Now, since it is dated June 3, 1997( when, again, CLINTON was president), which is 3 years and 5 months BEFORE November of 2000 , there is NO WAY IN HELL they could have known what would happen a little over 3 years later.

             I know, I shouldn’t be confusing “truthers” with facts and logic like that.  I will say this much:  Normally, I’d feel guilty about torturing dumb animals but “truthers” just invite the abuse.

%d bloggers like this: