New “Truther” Lies Exposed

“Truther” A and his cohort, “Truther” B are once again showing what idiots “truthers” are.

They have once again brought up Richard Gage, head of AE911Truth as their “expert.”  There are quite a few problems, though.

             Scroll about a quarter of the way down the page here  and you will see that the number of high rises (ie, skyscrapers) Gage has designed is zilch, zero, nada.   Also, the same site  points out Gage has NO ORIGINAL WORK OF HIS OWN (emphasis mine) with respect to 9/11.

            This is also the same Gage who made this statement, found here: “Well that’s why they would have used thermite, which is a more silent, um, thermate, which is a special form of thermite with added sulfur, because obviously you wouldn’t want a whole bunch of explosions to be heard, even though they were, it’s not a perfect science. They have a hundred and eighteen witnesses just from those who were recorded in the oral histories.””  Hmm, seems to me that Gage is contradicting himself here. If the explosives are silent, then you aren’t going to be able to hear them and if you hear them, then they obviously aren’t silent.  Oh, and one other thing:  Thermite (or thermate) is NOT an explosive; it’s an INCENDIARY.

            Gage also ignores the difference between a static (stationary) load and a dynamic (moving) load (reference ).

            Gage also thinks that the fire departments foreknowledge of the WTC 7 collapse proves controlled demolition (source ). This quote from here explains what Gage thinks: “Gage also lists FDNY foreknowledge as partial evidence of controlled demolition of WTC 7. FDNY foreknowledge means, they knew the building was going to collapse. FDNY Chief Daniel Nigro made the decision to evacuate, he did not receive the evacuation order from some higher-ups. This means Chief Nigro had foreknowledge. This means Chief Nigro’s foreknowledge is evidence of controlled demolition. This means Chief Nigro is involved.”  Here’s a word of advice to Richard Gage and “truthers” in general: this is called a LOGICAL FALLACY.   This site  gives the following definition of a logical fallacy: “A logical fallacy is an element of an argument that is flawed, essentially rendering the line of reasoning, if not the entire argument, invalid.”  As an example, “Truther”  A stated that he looks to see who benefited from the 9/11 attack, implying that he thinks anyone who benefited from said attacks were behind them.  Again, this is not necessarily true.  If a rich relative dies in a car accident and leaves you all their money, obviously you benefited but you did not necessarily cause the car accident.
            Daniel Nigro explains his decision here  and as you can see, it was a JUDGEMENT call on his part. He was, as he put it, the “ranking fire officer.”

            This quote from here explains the REAL reason the firefighters anticipated the WTC 7 collapse: “ We headed toward 7. And just around we were about a hundred yards away and Butch Brandies came running up. He said forget it, nobody’s going into 7, there’s creaking, there are noises coming out of there, so we just stopped.”  That’s NOT proof that the firefighters were in on a conspiracy.  Firefighters are trained to recognize the sound of a possible building collapse, among other things, as part of their jobs.

            I will have more on this in a future article, but as you can see, “truthers” are clearly sanity-challenged.

Oh, and on a different note, thank you to JennSierra of Fort Hard Knox (FHK) for helping me get this blog going

%d bloggers like this: